Source gazette.com Jim Flynn is with the Colorado Springs firm of Flynn & Wright LLC. You can contact him at email@example.com.
The trial court and the Court of Appeals sided with Melissa on this issue and held that ERISA’s preemption of state law applies to both the basic termination-on-divorce part of the statute and the can-be-sued-to-give-it-back part of the statute. So, Melissa gets to keep the money. However, the Court of Appeals ruled the position taken by Charles’ personal representative in the litigation was not frivolous and refused Melissa’s request for an award of her attorneys fees. To further confuse things, the Colorado statute has an additional provision saying that, if an ex-spouse receives a distribution because federal law has preempted the basic termination-of-beneficiaries-on-divorce rule, the ex-spouse receiving the distribution can be sued and required to give back the money. It’s this latter provision that Charles’ personal representative relied on when suing Melissa. Although previous court decisions had made it clear ERISA’s preemption of the basic termination-on-divorce statute is effective, this can-be-sued-to-give-it-back part of the statute had never been tested. Thus, the question for the courts became: does ERISA also preempt this must-give-it-back add on to the basic statute?
The lesson from this case would seem to be clear. For parties going through a divorce, the issue of beneficiary designations needs to be specifically addressed and the Colorado statute saying beneficiary designations are canceled on divorce cannot be relied on, especially if the beneficiary designation was created as part of an employee benefits plan. If Charles had changed the beneficiary designation on his life insurance policies after the divorce and before his death, this lawsuit never would have happened and Charles’ estate would have received the $535,000, to be distributed in accordance with the terms of his will. Now, to bring the law into play, Colorado has a statute that says beneficiary designations of any sort, including life insurance beneficiary designations, are canceled when a divorce decree enters. However, the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which was applicable here, says an administrator of an employee benefits plan must honor the beneficiary designations in place at the time a distribution is made, with no mention of divorce. And, ERISA goes on to say it preempts any state law to the contrary.
The News Highlights
- Money & the Law: Legal Waters Muddle when State and Federal Laws Conflict | The business
- Check the latest News news updates and information about business, finance and more.
For Latest News Follow us on Google News
- Show all
- Trending News
- Popular By week