Edict around the White House "This is not the result of the White House's formal policy-making process," said Lindsay Walter, Vice President of the White House.
according to, Washington, Walters denied that White House officials were drafting a constitutional draft, investigated how social media platform mitigates user behavior, and to further investigate and take potential legal action He urges to point out prejudice against the Justice Department.
Bloomberg First report the draft legislation, copy a copy of the document Internal business.
The relevant text of the project is shown below (from Internal business):
Section 2. Responsibility of the agency. (A) Authority departments and executive bodies capable of promoting competition between online platforms (agencies), if consistent with other laws, promote competition and include online platform including promoting bias Do not guarantee consumers.
(B) Organizations authorized to investigate anticompetitive acts may be required by the online platform to comply with the Antimonopoly Act under the provisions of Clayton Act (a), 15 USC § 12, or any other law designed to protect competition We have to thoroughly investigate whether they are in violation.
(C) If the organization knows that the platform is likely to have a platform or has actual anticompetitive behavior, and that the organization knows that it is not authorized to investigate and / or prosecute, the problem will be against the Department of Justice It should be left to the trust department. Justice and Competition Bureau. Federal Trade Commission.
While there are some rational arguments against the regulation of social media platforms, "bias" is probably not the most common.
This did not prevent prejudice claims initiated under the pretext
Hope you like the news:
The White House said that the draft enforcement order to review social media companies is not 'official'
#Stay Tuned For More Updates :)