As I know today, TIOBE 's index goes on occasion. It is supposed to measure the popularity of the world's programming language, and the popular timeline is simple. Java and C have long been the language of mind.
Wait a minute. Not so early. Rival's "Index of PYPL" (popularity of programming language) shows that Python and Java are joint kings and C (surprisingly integrated in C ++) is well below the list It is. What is going on here?
The two indexes have a very different methodology, even if there is something in common with the methodology, if the purpose is to measure the popularity of the programming language. TIOBE measures the amount of search engine results. PYPL measures how often language tutorials are displayed on Google.
Both are bad measures. Availability of online resources can be expected to be a very slow indicator. Once in the dominant language there are millions of dedicated web pages, zombie sites, and blogs over the next few years. The frequency of research tutorials is very strongly oriented towards languages taught to students in large quantities. This is not a measure of what language practitioners actually use.
When you see that number, there are lots of strange anomalies. According to TIOBE, the last C has moved to the programming language of that year in 5 months from the lowest evaluation. I can buy that C has been reinstated in the embedded system. However, I can easily imagine that this is a product of a very imperfect means.
However, the most troubling abnormality in these two measures is the relative performance of Objective-C and Swift, the two languages used to create native iOS applications. I can certainly believe that together, they are seeing a decline in the face of recent popularity …
Hope you like the news:
What is going on with the popularity scale of the programming language? -
#Stay Tuned For More Updates :)The Compsmag is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, which is an affiliate advertising program designed to offer sites a means to earn advertising costs by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.